The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
FT Edit: Access on iOS and web
。下载安装汽水音乐是该领域的重要参考
The Stone family were staying in a hotel on The Palm in Dubai near Jebel Ali Port which was affected by debris from an intercepted missile。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
Most people are used to the idea of “adding” a module to a system or “removing” a module from a system without a requirement to write any new code.
Reflections on vibecoding ticket.elA recap on writing an Emacs module without knowing Elisp nor looking at the code